Matthew Graybosch is a user on octodon.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.

It makes me smile to see programmers having the same arguments about language that philosophers have been having about stories for three thousand years.

@Mainebot I suspect that many programmers would consider philosophy the least relevant branch of the humanities.

@starbreaker

Kind of a real shame.

The humanities in general get endless amounts of shit from other disciplines, but then you see shockingly immoral silicon valley 'disruption' and then suddenly "oh no how could we ever have foreseen this no one could have predicted this," but seriously, a philosophy student, an English major, or even just a rhetorician could have fixed your problem before it started.

@Mainebot @starbreaker Yeah, but humanity majors have basically run the world for the past hundred years. Don't most politicians have backgrounds in Poli sci and law?

@Canageek @starbreaker

From my experience, Poli sci and law are pretty well-removed from what traditionally passes for the humanities.

When I was in school, the only time we had anyone from either discipline in a class was because it was a firm requirement to graduate. Non-participatory, simple classes, in it for the grade. In the same way I had science prerequisites, so I took weather science and statistics.

I am not a meteorologist, nor am I a statistician.

@Mainebot @starbreaker My frustration when I took most history classes was there was no way to prove if you are right, so what is the point? If I disagree with another scientist, I can go into the lab and figure out which one of us is right. Whereas when I took Science, Technology And the World, a history class, it basically felt like every essay was an opinion piece.

@Canageek @Mainebot The rules are different in the humanities. It's not about being right. It about making the strongest possible case for your interpretation.

@starbreaker @Mainebot @Canageek
So it's not about seeking truth but convincing everyone around you that you've found it.

@drequivalent @Canageek @starbreaker

If anyone ever actually finds truth, I would weep for everyone else.

@Mainebot @starbreaker @Canageek
*shrugs* Scientists do try. They know they probably will never see the whole picture, but they do their damnedest to try, and I cheer for that.
And I'm not putting down humanities, they are important, because somehow we have to decide what to do with all those pesky humans which are us, don't we.

Matthew Graybosch @starbreaker

@drequivalent @Canageek @Mainebot We could just leave them alone and let them do their own thing as long as they aren't hurting anybody else or fucking up the environment.

· Web · 0 · 1