@CobaltVelvet
https://social.tchncs.de/@amac/528585
Do you think they are saying that regardless of our efforts to prevent it, they plan to use our posts as content on their if-shit-could-shit tier, chain of aunts forwarded, youtube freebooting, swear-to-GOD-if-fucking-dale-tries-to-stop-me-on-the-way-out-to-watch, letterbox emoji covered, make-grumpy-cat-look-like-Infinite-Jest-ass Facebook page? If so donβt know what you can do (either technically or in the rules), but Iβd prefer they didnβt.
@Tezcatlipoca I don't have any context, are they doing anything bad?
It's true that blocks don't really prevent someone from seeing your toots if they want to, just like on birdsite.
@CobaltVelvet ...I guess partially that upset because I live-blogged eating a whole pie on here that I wanted to keep lowkey. And it's pretty clear I am the badguy in that equation. I will delete the new change.org petition.
@CobaltVelvet Huh, I should have probably figured that out already. I thought public meant public to accts. They had only had 13 toots yesterday, but was already arguing with an admin from somewhere about how much spam they could post per day due to a technicality. Also they made a toot about adding 100 people and they only had 80 by the time I saw them (I assume due to blocks). But I don't know that they have done all that much against the rules yet. Accusing them of precrimes I guess.