Yo Bitbucket is just deleting Mercurial repositories by June 2020 -- they've given no reason why they aren't make mercurial repositories read-only. Deleting them wholesale seems so unnecessary and hostile.
@vickysteeves “Sunsetting” has to be my least favorite word of modern corporate PR speak. It’s so rage-inducing it makes me want to scream and strangle someone. Like, it’s pretty clear you’re shutting down and abandoning shit in a way that will massively inconvenience your users, so just fucking say so.
I hate this American custom of downplaying everything with euphemisms whenever you fuck up.
@vickysteeves wait, what?!
@hirojin yeah it's not cool at all. every other provider did so much better than this. it's not like Atlassian doesn't have the $$!
@vickysteeves i really just took the news in stride
yet another big company sunsetting the thing that made them big
so i didn't actually read any of the news… and didn't realize they're not just sunsetting it, but killing it, and setting it on fire.
@vickysteeves It's sad for sure. Hostile and unnecessary, though, I don't agree with.
If you offer something, you're supporting it, and if you're supporting it, you have to spend money on it.
They don't want to spend money on it... I get that. I think it's sad, but they're not being hostile in not wanting to spend money on something that's a negibgible and shrinking part of their product.
@emacsen Atlassian isn't wanting for money, and by their own admission Mercurial repos make up 1% of their repos overall. There's no money argument to be made here, IMO.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!