"Smart" and networked proprietary devices should be very much called what they are: dystopian junk.
If you want a less polemic term, use "automated surveillance devices," but really all of these TVs, home assistants, toasters, fridges, smoke detectors, etc. are dystopian junk.
We need "low tech" appliances, and we need personal computing devices that are, by design, fully controllable by the people using them.
@therealraccoon it's buck wild that good, dumb appliances are made almost solely by luxury kitchen brands, making reliable equipment that doesn't surveil you yet another privilege retained by the monied.
@microwavenby a *good* appliance lasts a long time and i suspect that these prices would seem normal if it weren't for all the easily-destroyed junk that's the norm for the market now.
i wonder how many of those companies take payment plans for things smaller than a refrigerator...
@therealraccoon that's half of the reason why consumer-level IoT is almost universally crap.
The other reason merits calling it not "surveillance devices" but "anal plugs". The act of taking a physical product and artificially tying it to an on-line service in order to extract rent, resulting in a device that will get bricked when said service disappears or one loses an account, is fundamentally abusive and user-hostile, and arguably anticompetitive given that such services usually subsidize the devices.
@therealraccoon related, still going on.
@therealraccoon I don't see why appliances wouldn't be good to be user controllable. For example with Home Assistant you can easily build cloud-free local home automation. We need access to the devices' firmware and liberate them from the corporate puppet masters.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!