Peter Amstutz is a user on octodon.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.

The term "political bombshell" starts to lose its punch when applied to the fourth scandal in five days.

@tetron Talk to the survivors of long-term bombing attacks.

The 8 months of the London Blitz.
The weeklong bombing of Hamburg in July of 1943.

The fact that bombs fell yesterday and the day before and the day before /that/ doesn't mean they're not still falling. Just that you're thinking much more of killing /yourself/ simply to stop it.

But yes, things continue apace.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bl
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombin

Peter Amstutz @tetron

@dredmorbius this is an interesting (and unexpected) perspective, thank you. For context I was referring to Trump's multiplying troubles and snarking on how media overuse of a term tends robs it of its emotional impact. If one considers the American democracy as the target of these "bombshells", I see what you mean about becoming terrified/numb/traumatized by the situation.

@tetron Desensitisation /is/ a thing.

Sometimes we see terms overused because they're being diluted. Sometimes it's because the ground-base situation has escalated. It can be difficult to tell the difference, it's a variant of the gague problem.

(Synopsis as I first heard it: how would you know, with a simple voltmeter, if you lived on a planet with a base (ground) charge of zero vs say 1 million volts?)

Language is full of watered-down words, it's awesome!