I'm gonna try posting publicly some and hope it's not a disaster. This platform looks like it has a lot of potential and I am eager to get off private, centralized services, but there's always the networking effect problem.
It worries me to join an instance without knowing what their moderation and longevity will look like in practice. Octodon looked promising. I hope it remains viable longterm.
Picking a site based on moderation policies: "Find something that's just restrictive enough to exclude anything you don't want to be exposed to, but just permissive enough to not boot you for anything you're likely to post."
A hard balance.
Hopefully stock implementation of CWs should make that problem a lot easier?
Question for Octodon: How many here read the "about" page for this instance before choosing it?
@starkatt Didn't - picked based on number of users & % uptime
@starkatt nope. A friend said she signed up this instance and called us
@starkatt but everyone is enjoying here
@starkatt I did! I poked through a few servers and looked at @CobaltVelvet's toots too.
@starkatt Skimmed. Based on a tweet. Confirmed after the fact.
@starkatt I definitely did. Looked at the various "open for new users" instances, read a few instances's "about" pages, then looked at @CobaltVelvet's toots & tweets, then finally skimmed her Pelican page.
But then, I'm a librarian. Information is my jam.
@starkatt i hope that in the future, instance admins can name mods to help out. or admins have to limit their instances to ~10 k users.
@starkatt Indeed it is. I don't think I'll keep doing that alone for much longer, I'm still waiting for proper user groups but I'm thinking about recruiting some moderators and/or a second admin just in case.
@starkatt it's really difficult to tell this early in
I also worry about moderation scaleability with single-admin instances. Hopefully the ability to unilaterally close signups will help with that. Moderation is still a hard, labor-intensive problem.