"RETURN VALUES
If successful, this call never returns. […]"
—reboot(2)
Opinion not approved by the thought leaders Show more
SSH Mastery, 2nd edition, now available! https://www.tiltedwindmillpress.com/?product=ssh-mastery-2nd-edition
Ebook will appear on Amazon, Kobo, etc, soon. SOON. Physical books take longer, sorry.
From an eBay item description: "Items will be repackaged to save your shipping charge & to be environmentally friendly. We guaranty the item will be protected well in buble bags, No retail box!"
Nothing says "environmentally friendly" like a bunch of plastic!
We’re about 150 responses away from 7,000 - I think we could hit 7,000 by the time I log off for the night, maybe?
Think about high fives. Like, think about that feeling you get behind your breastbone when you do a really good high five with someone you like. Sit with that feeling a second.
OK. Virtual high five, then, from me: You made it another day, another 24 hours. Another week. Wherever and whoever you were a week ago isn't where and who you are now. You're growing and changing and living life. And that's worth a high five.
✋🏻
reminder that "you're one of today's lucky 10,000" is a way better reaction than "what kind of person doesn't know about {thing}?" https://www.xkcd.com/1053/
The invention of ‘heterosexuality’
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170315-the-invention-of-heterosexuality
'The 1901 Dorland’s Medical Dictionary defined heterosexuality as an “abnormal or perverted appetite toward the opposite sex.” More than two decades later, in 1923, Merriam Webster’s dictionary similarly defined it as “morbid sexual passion for one of the opposite sex.” It wasn’t until 1934 that heterosexuality was graced with the meaning we’re familiar with today: “manifestation of sexual passion for one of the opposite sex; normal sexuality.”
Whenever I tell this to people, they respond with dramatic incredulity. That can’t be right! Well, it certainly doesn’t feel right. It feels as if heterosexuality has always “just been there.”...'
Bear in mind Show more
So recently in discussion, @lindar pitched an idea I really liked. Here it is, with an addition by me, so it's not hidden in threads. Please share and use if you like it.
The idea is that interacting with other folks' selfies can be somewhat fraught because you don't know where their boundaries are. And asking, "Can I compliment your appearance?" sort of short-circuits consent.
So when you post a #selfie, add tags:
• nocom (no comments/compliments)
• okcom (comments/compliments OK)
• rqcom (comments/compliments requested)
Also, if you want to specify the difference, you could replace -com with -flirt and/or use them in combination like [rqcom, noflirt].
Today I learned about tail attacks -- a kind of low-volume #DDoS attack that raises the tail latency of the target application. This sort of attack is wonderfully sneaky and hard to detect because it's based on short traffic pulses, unlike the more traditional torrent of packets, and just makes the victim service perform worse.
http://blog.acolyer.org/2017/12/11/tail-attacks-on-web-applications/
I explained to J that I am annoyed about the mastodon upgrade I was going to get started on and why and he suggested I watch this and I am feeling SO MUCH BETTER. https://tootplanet.space/media/4Ei7SmEc0Qq6fGRHb2c