Follow

absolutely losing it over this pull request: "fix original typesetter's errors to reproduce cummings' manuscript"

github.com/ee-cummings-archive

@djsundog @monorail @schlink brb building a bot that will correct the original typesetting errors in your toots to reproduce ee cummings' original drafts.

@schlink I don’t understand. What’s the problem with that commit?

@Sylvhem @schlink The discussion is interesting: The original file accurately reflects the original print, while the change accurately reflects the original manuscript. This is not under discussion, the maintainer agrees. But which version should be in the repo?

Perhaps there should be two repos or in some other way two versions of some files?

github.com/ee-cummings-archive…
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Octodon

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!