Thinking about summoning, contracts, and Rumplestiltskin
This morning thinking about old stories of summoning, which often end up being stories of barter or contract law. In particular, that there's often a supernatural party that ends up accepting the one thing that supernatural entities can't provide, which is human life (asking for a child or a human soul is common). What I'm puzzled by is why in so many of the stories, the petitioner is offered a "pity out" (as in Rumplestiltskin). To make the deal palatable? What modern contracts include an "out" clause to help convince people to sign?
@phooky the last few times i borrowed tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars, i received a fat stack (like, three or six) of "Notice of Cancellation" forms and was duly informed of my Right To Cancel for three days after signing.
@jleedev cancellation clauses are close, but I'm thinking of situations where you imagine you can get something for nothing, even though it's very unlikely.
@phooky "is an immortal soul a quid pro quo" - the greatest thread in the history of r/legaladviceofftopic, locked by a moderator after 12,239 pages of heated debate,
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!