Toy manufacturers: just no
@phooky that's cursed
@phooky FFS 🙄
@phooky ah, the two genders: Robertson and Phillips
@phooky Hasbro is a villain who’s plot is to sort the entire universe into the gender binary. The only one who can stop this dastardly scheme? Bond, THEYmes Bond. Whose been given a license to bend and swap by theMI5.
This might be controversial, but I'm not sure I see gendering here. I see two different stylistic choices. If I see them as gendered, that's me, not them.
For sure, if there's a 'pink aisle' in the toy store, and if that's part of a gendered organisation of products, I'm unhappy with that. But I'm not sure that's what we have here.
@EdS that's true in a technical sense, but it's clear what they're aiming for in context. These aren't aesthetic choices in a vacuum and this has a very different intent than offering a steampunk variant, or a filigree variant, or a beige normcore version. I can't blame them for choosing to do this, but they could also... not.
I see what you're saying, and I'm not 100% sure of my position, but I wouldn't want to see "we can't have pink toys."
Those two toys are exactly the same shape and almost the same product name. One might argue they will appeal, and are meant to appeal, to two different recognisable sensibilities. But if they are side by side, and a child can choose whichever, isn't that fine?
(Previously, and similarly, two calculators, one being pink.)
I'm no gender theory expert...
@penguin42 @EdS oof, this discussion. I'll just drop my salient points and skedaddle:
* we don't need to make gendered versions of toys
* there are a large number of people who will only purchase children's toys that are implicitly or explicitly coded to a gender
* making a gender-coded version of this robot will help to allow kids surrounded by those people to play with robots
* we still don't need to make gendered versions of toys
@phooky at least the pink one is the same price :p
re: gendering robots
@firstname.lastname@example.org @email@example.com I was just noticing that. Trying to decide whether they have some hold over the pink plastic sources to force them to sell at a discount or if their just that overpriced that they can absorb it. Because surely pink plastic must be super expensive to justify those price differences, right?
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!