@noslebadlorah sorry buddy, do you expect us to read you article ?

@bgcarlisle I am not saying it is impossible, just not very probable :/

@bgcarlisle I don't think we have plans for migrations. We haven't looked at how it is done currently and that sounds like a hard problem to solve.

I know some people tried to do masto -> pleroma or the otherway around and that didn't matterialise because it is quite hard.

So I am talking minimal interoperability

@bgcarlisle Hum, some amount of it yeah.
I don't think we plan to support the full AP specs, more like bare minimum to get us going

Parastat boosted

Making the skeleton of the Parastat settings page...

@loweel we don't owe you anything.
Please be demanding in someone else's mention.

Parastat boosted
Parastat boosted

J'ai accès au Mr Cuisine Connect hacké demandez moi un truc à afficher dessus et je le mettrai

I have access to that hacked kitchen robot thing ask me for stuff to display on it

@tixie thank you :)
We have a great designer, that helps a lot

A small reminder that if you have question on , you can always @ this account.

The answer will likely take sometime, but usually we reply to everyone that has questions.

(note: @ our individual accounts with generic question is bad form tho)

Parastat boosted

Some taste of what is to come (this is not a mockup tho, its the real thing)

OCAP is there to fix ActivityPub problems, but doesn't change AP fundamentally.

Maybe there are voices that never make it to the W3C.
Maybe design by committee is not the only way we should build the fedi.
We think that there is power in diversity.

People rolled their own protocol before, the fediverse has quite a few: Dispora, ActivityPub, OStatus, Zot, DFRN already (handy picture attached).

I'd argue Mastodon has been and is a success despite underlying protocol(s).

@schmittlauch There will be one of us at fosdem, so maybe not a rounded representation of the whole project/team.

On AP, we probably plan to do both communication on a subset of the feature. It is not written yet, so I cannot really tell you more than that.

Compromise are usually good, nothing fits every use case right.
We might just not share the same ones to the w3c working groups on social stuff.

I'm not sure where you get the idea of proprietary protocol, it wont be proprietary

Going to ?
Want to get some parastat sticker?

Find the Purple hoodie wearer with our logo at the front

Parastat boosted

@dzuk @parastat that is what happen when I try to make the front work 😱

Parastat boosted

Using the @parastat Closed Alpha server (which only currently has a CLI interface) right now be like

Parastat boosted

I maintain that @forktogether is still a project to watch because it has good people with experience behind it.

I am genuinely intrigued by @parastat though. The three individuals behind it are well known "good eggs" on the fediverse and I look forward to seeing what they produce too. 🙂

Parastat boosted

@trechnex @parastat

I completely agree! I'm not too fussed who does the work, it excites me to see so many projects coming out of some people stepping away from Masto-main.
So I'm happy and excited either way!

Show more

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!