social media debate often seems the equivalent of being stuck in a room of students who are trying to bluff they way around the fact that almost no one's done the required reading and getting into a heated argument over nothing because the other option is to sit there in silence and the teacher finding out they don't know what they're talking about. meanwhile the teacher is bored, doesn't care, but didn't have any lesson plan beyond "let the students argue".
i once spent over half an hour in class during my Masters listen to a guy argue that feminism was bad without knowing what feminism meant. He ended up arguing that just because he believed women should have equal pay, equal rights, and that things were currently unbalanced in favour of men, didn't make him a feminist, because the word was bad.
@mxsiege one has to sob at the cognitive dissonance
Reinforced by the popular superstition that not being invested on informed improves your capacity for judgement
@eweish yes totally that. "I am the people"
@mxsiege Ever since I've learned to keep quiet or admit that I have no opinion or I'm not informed enough I'm so much happier. Embrace the gap! (German proverb)
@mxsiege whomst among us
i remember leading a lot of those tutorials because I'd listened to fifteen minutes of an audio reading of the material on the way to the class
Oh uhh, uhhhh punchline the uhhh, "and that's what it feels like for me being a member of a minority group whilst still super privileged" ??
@mxsiege if the students haven't done the reading in a discussion seminar, it's hard to recover from without a ready lecture and discussion, but those take new teachers (like TAs, who tend to run these) hours to write. Like 5 hours per hour. That time isn't paid at all if its a seminar…
Letting students fight is also a bad plan, but there's almost no training. The NLRB just ruled TAs have no right to unionise.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!