Jenna Magius is a user on octodon.social. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.

Jenna Magius @jennamagius@octodon.social

@PsySal "Oh, we should just delete all the one star games because they're bad games"

Or "creator, you created a bad game and you should feel bad."

Those are terrible ideas. I love a one star game, when that's the mood I'm in & the thing I have time for.

@PsySal I think that's kinda a mixed bag. I think they provide value in helping people spend limited time efficiently, BUT: not in the way that "Oh, it saves them time because they don't have to play bad games".

More like... it gives information about scope and tone that helps players pick games that match their at-the-time needs.

There's probably a better way to communicate that information that doesn't lend itself to wrong ideas like:

@varx Thank you for receiving my @ s and helping me think this through :p

@varx "I'm not going to get mad that this video game is excessively talky because it's not final." Just don't get mad about games being talky at all!

Design games with less dialog, play games with less dialog, but _don't_ conflate your preferences with an independent truth.

@varx You got me past my roadblock in understanding my feelings about this.

I'm not worried about a deficiency in engaging critically with works. I just hate the concept of declaring media "good" or "bad" as if that's some kind of context-free truth.

@varx "There's no point in understanding this game I'm playing because it isn't the release version"

@varx Also that sentence doesn't seem like it's even gramatical? But that's neither here nor there.

To be a bit more precise/honest about my feelings, I'm watching a Pathfinder: Kingmaker alpha LP and the LPer keeps saying "I'm not going to criticize this because this is an alpha and it's probably going to change."

WE CRITICIZE THINGS TO UNDERSTAND THEM DEEPLY. THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR. NOT TO DECIDE IF THEY'RE GOOD OR NOT.

@varx Huh! That's a term I wasn't familiar with. Thanks for the link.

I will call out that the first sentence of the second paragraph is "Problematization is a CRITICAL thinking" :p

@jennamagius Or even "some parts of this are good, some parts are bad, distinguish which is which".

I am extremely not interested in the definition of "criticism" that is like "distinguish good media from bad media".

Hey y'all, remember when Google Talk was XMPP

Ironic insofar as... the problem with trying to get people to switch away from closed platforms is mostly only a problem _because those are closed platforms_.

Ironically, one of the most important properties of an open platform is that it's easy to switch away from.

It'd be nice to have a client that presented both tweets and toots to me, and Twitter is the bottleneck on that.

Jenna Magius boosted

@tinker (Also they took it out like... August 2017, I was just now noticing XD)

@tinker (At one point I played hard enough to get up to Exhumer class mining, but I too fell off long ago)

@tinker Well, I mean, the argument is "Nobody who actually plays EVE uses it!" and that's fair, because I used it but didn't really play EVE XD

Ducking in once a year to take some new profile picture selfies is a pretty manageable time commitment :p

THAT WAS LITERALLY THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF EVE FOR ME

THEY TOOK CAPTAINS QUARTERS OUT OF EVE