Having moderated a large online community for about a decade now, I'm finding the collective arguing about CW protocol and kindness vs. freedom interesting and familiar and tiring and valuable all in a mix.
Community self-identification is a weird process, and I think I am mostly glad that mastodon doesn't by its very structure require the answer to be monolithic and universal.
But I will tip my hand a little and say that erring on the side of kindness is pretty much always defensible.
@joshmillard I agree 100%. CW is a powerful and easy tool, and we should use it. I remember when MeFites wanted something similar on threads with spoilers, and tried ROT13, which was not really convenient, and also kind of annoying to look at. And IIRC, the mods were not fans of it?
@ikea_femme Yeah, I think there are structural aspects on MeFi specifically that make it more complicated -- partly because there was such a long baking-in of community practice and culture there already -- though I suspect at that we'll continue talking about it. But MeFi also has 24/7 top-down moderation, very different scale in how we can soft-manage those issues when they're not automated or sort of abstractedly tool-based.
@ikea_femme That we can, on the site, say "okay there are a handful of people whose paid jobs it is to specifically wrangle the details of these disputes" and that we have a relatively limited number of channels/verbs from which those disputes can arise makes it more possible to deal with the problem in a manual, case-by-case way than e.g. trying to establish a federation-wide culture of practice through collective, essentially leaderless discussion.
@joshmillard We put a lot of trust in not just our own instances, but admins of other instances with inter-instance DMs, for one. If every user and instance got a PGP key, and end-to-end encryption was an easy option for communication, that could fix a lot of more obvious abuses/invasions of privacy.