@Latkes I'm not up on how that works with those of us who get healthcare through work. Would that just not happen any more in CA? I wonder, if my work no longer had to kick in for my hc, would they give me a raise, or would I just lose that benefit and they make out, and I end up paying more? (That's not a deal breaker for me. Just wondering.) I'm probably all for this, but I haven't looked up the deets.
@fobo @greermahoney Yeah, there is a realistic plan in the works - SB 562. The barrier to me seems to be when the mighty arm of the insurance companies comes down hard on this bill. Healthy SF allows them to still operate, but a statewide plan would not. We'd still get to choose our provider, but insurance companies would be out of the picture.
@greermahoney Basically, instead of your job paying the insurance company, they would pay into Healthy California instead. They would pay less than now, because insurance companies are an added, useless expense. I believe 30% of healthcare costs are now going to them. So instead of this big bureaucratic insurance infrastructure, employers pay into Healthy California, and Healthy California pays the providers directly (we'd still all get to choose our providers)
@Latkes I'm behind that! Sounds way better! Thanks for taking the time to clear that up for me.
@greermahoney Sure. Are you in California? If so, check out the bill http://www.healthycaliforniaact.org/home/ I know NY is working on a bill too
@Latkes Yeah, I am, and I will. Thanks!
@Latkes @greermahoney SF already has Healthy San Francisco, which subsidizes health care for uninsured residents. If CA could implement single payer and make it work, that's a path for other states to follow. I'd be really excited to see them make a go at it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthy_San_Francisco