thinking about how kamala harris, while the attorney general of california, argued against the supreme court order to relieve crowding in the state's prisons by releasing inmates on the grounds that their forced labour was too important for the state

'it's okay we're keeping these people in inhumane conditions because we're also enslaving them'

or her anti-truancy initiative which put parents into jail for their children not attending school ('oh so your kid doesn't want to go to school because they're getting bullied for not being able to afford lunch? guess what'll really help'), or her fight to keep wrongfully convicted people in prison

objectively the difference between her and adolf eichmann is opportunity


anyway vote blue: 'we let girl bosses run concentration camps too'

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!