huh. I can't wrap my head around why this was even a question. What is the purpose of a supreme court if not to ensure that all citizens have representation? Why participate in an organization that doesn't serve it's function? It "broke two justices" yet it appears simple to me. I must be missing things, but I can't even tell what those things are.


In the abstract, I can imagine circumstances where a judgement becomes hard. But in the facts before the court it seems entirely obvious to me.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!