@schmittlauch How do you send someone an email? Either you have that person "bookmarked" in your addressbook, or they were part of the addressing in that conversation (by introduction)
I have some more in this unfinished document https://github.com/cwebber/rebooting-the-web-of-trust-spring2018/blob/petnames/draft-documents/making-dids-invisible-with-petnames.md
@schmittlauch I didn't suggest that route
@schmittlauch Webfinger makes sense indeed when you have a user@domain email style addressing expectation. That's not the only UI experience possible, and indeed it won't even be feasible if people start doing interesting things like ActivityPub + tor onion services. Something something petnames here.
sorry, I mean
I don't know how to blit many in a way that's performant (when doing a fresh draw)
I ported the Racket Game of Life demo I did from big-bang to lux in Racket. It was an easy port.
I still don't know how to blit many objects on the screen at once in either, though...
@schmittlauch Subscription should work without webfinger I think...? It's a Follow activity to the actor's id, so...
Nice to see a blogpost on the Mastodon blog about implementing a basic ActivityPub server https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2018/06/how-to-implement-a-basic-activitypub-server/
(Though technically webfinger isn't needed for activitypub, but it is for mastodon interop!)
New blog post: How to implement a basic ActivityPub server https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2018/06/how-to-implement-a-basic-activitypub-server/
@Elizafox so you can harass me with your drones??? NO THANKS ELISA
wait by oaklahoma I mean ohio
indiana was boring to drive through
will oaklahoma also be boring to drive through??? place your bets folks
I can be down with the Ace of Bass + gloomy skies aesthetic
@gargron the correct response
On the road with @mlemweb, a cat, a rat, and the last of our stuff that isn't in the moving van. See you tomorrow Easthampton, MA!