rms, fsf, conservancy 

@conservancy just published a blogpost: "Richard Stallman Does Not and Cannot Speak for the Free Software Movement"

re: rms, fsf, conservancy 

@cwebber @conservancy

Since English is not my first language, could you be kind enough to explain the precise meaning of the phrase "Most importantly, we cannot support anyone, directly or indirectly, who condones the endangerment of vulnerable people by rationalizing any part of predator behavior."?

I'm not certain that it's precise enough to not include rational analysis of the motives of "predators", but it certainly can be because I don't understand the exact semantic of the phrase.

rms, fsf, conservancy 

@cwebber @conservancy I'm in support! Yet, I would be interested in a list of signatories or clarification on if this is a unanimous response by the SFC board?

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!