"Effective Standards Work, Part 1: The Lay Of The Land" by Alex Russell https://infrequently.org/2018/06/effective-standards-work-part-1-the-lay-of-the-land/
It's hard to explain how web standards work, or why anyone should care about the process. Kudos to Alex for at least taking a stab at it.
@nolan Standards work is often also in many cases too privileged to an elite group. You and I have been able to participate because currently we both have employers backing us, and before that for me I was well known enough to be brought in as an "invited expert" to a w3c group (which is comparatively rare).
I'd still like to see a standards body with a less corporate-oriented form of governance.
But yeah the process is pretty opaque/baffling to newcomers, and even if you have a good idea it's unclear whether any implementors (i.e. browsers) are interested in your idea. There's also a lot of NIH.
@nolan I've had plenty of experiences both within the W3C and also with WHATWG where "if you aren't a browser, you aren't really defining things" standards wise, and it seems even more with WHATWG than the former.
That may be fine-ish for some standards that are mostly "capturing what browsers are implementing" but I think there are a lot of other standards to be done that don't fit that category