@cwebber @jordyd

Do you mean this? http://www.weboftrust.info/

@rdh @jordyd yep!

@rdh @jordyd I also wrote a paper for the conference about how AP and this work could get along https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rebooting-the-web-of-trust-fall2017/blob/master/final-documents/activitypub-decentralized-distributed.pdf

It's fairly out of date though

@rdh @jordyd Also might as well link this while I'm at it, here's a paper on petnames we never finished but has the core ideas https://github.com/cwebber/rebooting-the-web-of-trust-spring2018/blob/petnames/draft-documents/making-dids-invisible-with-petnames.md

If you can understand that, you can start to understand how to kill CAs and DNS.

@cwebber @rdh
That's a very neat idea

@jordyd @rdh Thanks... it's not new! These ideas have been around (and even implemented before) for ages, we were just trying to clean them up and explain clearly to a modern audience

@cwebber @rdh
Do you know of any projects that are headed in this direction?

@jordyd @rdh When Spritely stops being vaporware, it will be. ;)

@cwebber @rdh @jordyd This is a really interesting PDF. Are there plans to use OpenPGP fingerprints as identifiers? They are inherently distributed. (As far as I know Monkeysphere uses `openpgp4fpr` URI scheme for that), Signed notes could be freely exchanged between fediverse nodes (they can be easily checked against the key), heck one could even use key certifications as "follow" mechanism. For the record OpenPGP is quite extensible (with metadata notations, etc).