@craigmaloney You mentioned Sourceforge. They removed one of my projects because it was dormant (or possibly because my user was dormant, I don't know if I had logged in for a few years).

I noticed it because I wanted to show some of my old code and the repository wasn't there anymore. I contacted Sourceforge and they were able to restore it again for me, which was lucky because I had no other copy of the code.

So I agree that what gitlab did was bad, but it's like they saw the mistakes Sourceforge did and just decided to do the same.

@loke That's unfortunate. They did have remarkable retention though, so I'm glad they restored the project.

@craigmaloney I much prefer the #GitLab transparency (their employee handbook and policy documents are all open source), reliability, authenticity (no deceptive ads anywhere), and dev tools (free CI-CD and static hosting), to #SourceForge's clickbait garbage pile. All you had to do to revive your neglected repo was a touch and push once a year. Not much to ask for all that free stuff.

@craigmaloney uggghh i think i have a project or 2 there (free). i’ll have to check in the morning. thanks for the heads-up

@craigmaloney well, it seems they have reconsidered and come up with an alternate scheme.


Interestingly, this appears to be based on read, rather than write, inactivity, which is also a better idea.

As for the broader implications and inferences, well, I may not extrapolate as far and fast as you do (for good reasons you disclose), but I will now be wary, as will many others, and ultimately that may amount to self-fulfilling prophesy regardless. Sigh.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!