I have gone from Matrix skeptic to subscribing to in the course of a year.

New hypocrite. Who dis?

· · Web · 6 · 1 · 6

@craigmaloney Heh, I actually think the ability of a person to change their mind based on new inputs as more than rare and laudable.

@craigmaloney Skepticism resulting in a reasoned evaluation is hardly hypocrisy.

@craigmaloney I'd be more on board with these services if they were more reasonably priced ... $5 a month for a messaging app?! That make no sense based on the type of resources it requires IMHO

@lps It's free otherwise. The $5 is for the Signal and other bridges.

@craigmaloney I'm still torn between that and XMPP... What do you like about Matrix?

@isagalaev I like them both, but Matrix offers more bridging support at the moment.

@craigmaloney I didn't realize at all it was possible to talk to various proprietary networks from it. That's kind of a killer feature!

@isagalaev @craigmaloney damn, when did Element One launch? I was previously paying for their $10/mo 5 user plan but that seems overkill.

The WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram bridging is wild. I'll definitely stop using at least two of those if this works well

@aruns @isagalaev @craigmaloney well, yes and no. The proprietary bridges cost extra on the $10 plan, and I don't have 5 users so I only picked it because it's the cheapest and I wanted to support the project.

@aruns @isagalaev @craigmaloney this is the sort of #adversarialinteroperability that @pluralistic advocate, so I'd rather it be managed for me anyway, I bet at least one of those three will try to break it at some point

@michel_slm It's important to understand that this bridging feature has an impact on end-to-end encryption for the bridged services. Just saying. @isagalaev @craigmaloney

@schaueho do you mean that encryption only works between you and the bridge, but not further towards the foreign client? Or something else?

@isagalaev The bridge itself is the client from Signal's perspective. Even if the communication between the bridge and your client is encrypted by Matrix, there is a point in time where your data is deciphered on the server and you have to trust the server. At least this is my understanding. And that's different from a pure end to end encryption.

@schaueho @isagalaev Yeah, it's a Matrix-in-the-Middle, if you'll pardon the expression. 😁

@craigmaloney @schaueho @isagalaev I have been very mistrusting of putting my auth data from an e2e service into another service via bridge.

I would be okay if I self hosted xmpp or matrix; or if bitlbee or libpurple supported it all well. However self hosting those two can be difficult to maintain.

I think now I am at a point where I long for a tabbed window experience where I can gather arbitrary windows (IM clients) into one tabbed window. I think sway and friends can do that but I would then really need to learn sway keyboarding.

@schaueho true. So you can host your bridge yourself if that's important to you. But I agree, it's something to be aware of.

@craigmaloney Nah, I'll wait for you to self-host that monster of a home server, only then I'll count you as converted

@craigmaloney I was in the same camp. Then I finally got around to trying it out and have really enjoyed it. Mostly, I like that I can access the remaining IRC channels I wanted to in addition to having a self hosted solution for video chat and encrypted chat.

Just nice to control that on my own hardware.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!