Better to be excluded for who you include, than included for who you exclude.

Well, unless you're including like, TERFs or fascists. Because fuck those people.

Include everything except exclusion itself.

Show thread

@InvaderXan I have an inkling that that's all already handled by the original formulation you gave. TERFs have "Exclusion" in the name after all, so if you're excluded for including excluders, that's kinda double-negative so it surely collapses into being included for who you exclude... whew

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!