@cat_abyss hmm. A handful of stuff can be divided into different sets of stuff, so a handful could be a superset, which means yes it can contain the empty set. (Where the empty set, by definition, has no stuff in it and so is 'the no stuff', as you say.)
@cat_abyss oh! Wait. You said 'part' not 'part of'. My bad. Yes. I'd say everything is part nothing. Or at least that it always has the possibility of finding emptiness when arranged/viewed the right way.
@cat_abyss but this is really just me being a mathematician and thinking about things in terms of set theory. Although I like the idea of it. Or perhaps it is more that I like how it sounds and what it evokes in words. I like when mathematics sounds a bit like philosophy or poetry.