@miles You are starting to creep me out...
β
My name is miles. I also do the hole dashes-to-seperate-ideas thing and you are the only other person I have seen use it. Also a big fan of the EFF... and use signal... and have my GPG key signature in my profile...
β
You dont... live in texas do you? No long lost children? No clones?
β
Seriously, Its uncanny. Abstract profile pic and everything...
@NthTensor all similarities addressed, though, your threat model seems very different from mine.
β
For example: you use Google services, I do not use Google services.
@miles You are correct, though I have been taking strides to distance myself; Moving more of my life out of google and similar.
β
Suffice to say and I am required to use google currently, and that I, for far to long, allowed connivence to take president over security. The process of untangling one's self is a long one.
@NthTensor I was in your situation. My current comm stack:
β’ ProtonMail for email
β’ personal ownCloud server for calendar/contacts/notes/reminders
β’ CopperheadOS android for mobile
β’ Firefox for browser
β’ Qubes for primary OS (soon)
β’ Signal for messaging, Ricochet when required. Silence also an option. SMS no-no.
(no security through obscurity β this information is safe being public)
@miles Ever looked into tox? I prefer it to signal, personally.
β
Thank you for the run down. I was about to ask for email suggestions. Some new ones I had not seen before. Thanks once more.
β
You dont appear to be useing key base. While I have the opportunity, I might as well ask; any specific reason?
@miles Tox is not centralized. https://github.com/irungentoo/toxcore.
@miles They definitely have forward forward security implemented. I do not think that tox has deniability, but dont quote me on that.
β
This issue might help clarify a tad. https://github.com/irungentoo/toxcore/issues/1254
@NthTensor looks interesting. But AFAIK from looking at the high level crypto overview, there is no forward secrecy or deniability... please correct me if I'm wrong.