@Elizafox but you're already burning in c hell
main issue with xml is that every single acronym with xml in it is already taken
@bortzmeyer jq "." -C | less -R 😉
@bortzmeyer i never remember the parameters to make it work nicely with less
@szbalint but was it really *bad*
let's say we make a standard xml subset, what's bad in it?
i kinda miss having xml everywhere
json awful to write and unreadable without indentation (counting the ]} )
yaml is far too complicated and intuitive for what it achieves
toml is nearly that but it's too flat, it's just not the same
hot take i will absolutely not stand by in a few hours
xml is actually great, both to read and write, by humans and machines (at least as a subset of xml).
@Efi what if you play sex in the cybre
or yeah literally both but it's less cool
@Efi why not
@Efi maybe one maybe the other maybe both at the same time
@Efi maybe both
hot take transfer protocol
@taziden ben ouais mais faut pas non plus les oublier, genre je vois souvent des gens qui veulent promouvoir l'auto-hébergement et après quand les gens ont des problèmes "ouais mais c'est le risque démerde toi"
trans pol, unrelated to current events Show more
trans pol, unrelated to current events Show more
trans pol, unrelated to current events Show more
trans pol, unrelated to current events Show more
trans pol, unrelated to current events Show more
trans pol, unrelated to current events Show more
trans pol, unrelated to current events Show more