Also, I think mandatory CW should only apply on public (=not unlisted/private/direct) tweets - everyone's okay with that?
@SunCat I promise I'll do that right someday.
@CobaltVelvet I think I should try to write a bot that toots about this mistake xD
@CobaltVelvet That might be a bit more controversial. But what's the disincentive for breaching CW rules anyway?
@PW Here I'm thinking about deleting toots and silencing accounts if it's on purpose or repeated.
@CobaltVelvet That sounds reasonable. Any problems I can imagine with direct etc toots would already be covered by anti-harassment policies.
@CobaltVelvet Speaking as a content moderator elsewhere, we'll need some more robust tools. I expect they're in the pipeline, though.
The case to worry about is replies on toots marked as unlisted etc. Harassment campaigns can be quite viscous that way, and very targeted.
A list, expanded from tn5421's Show more
@CobaltVelvet Sounds perfectly sensible. You want to play in the public pool, play nice. Otherwise keep it to your teacup, which everyone is free to ignore or block.
@CobaltVelvet toots*