@Rasgueado And a lot of fur babies! #Catstodon
@hmich176 I'm not sure. It almost feels too loosy-goosey for a qucik-burst social media platform. But then. anything is going to feel loose after the tyranny of 140 characters.
@Rasgueado Damnit, yes! This is important! #Catstodon
500 character, I mean. Typo, not stupid. :D
I remember when Twitter was still young and everything hadn't been done to death on it and timelines made sense ... and there was a movement to write "Twitter novels." Only writing a story in 140 character bursts was LITERAL TORTURE. I tried it. It sucked. Apparently big in Japan though.
Anyway, wondering if this little 500-word microburst format wouldn't be a much better choice for such a venture. I can write freaking paragraphs in this space.
@shuntley Thanks for the explanation. I guess I'm not used to this sort of decentralized setup yet.
(And yeah, Star Trek thing was a bad attempt at humor :D )
@CobaltVelvet Thanks for the clarification. I'm starting to get the gist of it.
I don't even know what I'm doing here. What's the difference between a "follow" and a "remote follow"? And why do pages keep making Star Trek references?
I am such a follower. I'm only here because people I follow on Twitter are here. So I followed them to this new Twitter.
Fuck, I should be working on something meaningful.
